Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-6.1 Sol match on price and context today: $2 input, $10 output and $0.10 cached input per 1M tokens, and 1.05M tokens each. Two things split them. The Argon price is introductory and rises to $4 and $20 on 1 December 2026, and GPT-6.1 Sol writes replies of up to 128K tokens against 66K for Argon.
Identical sessions until December
With every rate the same, our sessions cost the same on both: $0.65 for a quick fix, $10.80 for the feature session, $97.50 for a long agent day, and $2.59 for the feature session with 90% of prompts cached. Filling the whole window once is $2.10 on each.
From 1 December 2026 the Argon input and output prices double. The price note we cite does not say whether its cached rate changes.
Benchmarks
There is one score between them: Argon's 57.4% on Terminal-Bench 4.0, from Google's comparison table as reproduced by HackerNoon. We found no score for GPT-6.1 Sol that we could cite, so we can't say which is stronger.
Dates and inputs
GPT-6.1 Sol was first listed on the API on 29 September 2026, and Google released Argon the next day, 30 September. Argon also reads video, audio and PDF files; GPT-6.1 Sol reads text and images. Against Anthropic's model at the same price, see Sonnet 5.5 against Gemini 4 Argon.
Side by side
| Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6.1 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | |
| Released | 30 September 2026[1] | 29 September 2026[2] first API listing |
| Context window | 1.05M tokens[3] | 1.05M tokens[4] |
| Max output | 66K tokens[3] | 128K tokens[4] |
| Input price | $2 per 1M tokens[5] | $2 per 1M tokens[4] |
| Output price | $10 per 1M tokens[5] | $10 per 1M tokens[4] |
| Cached input | $0.10 per 1M tokens[5] | $0.10 per 1M tokens[4] |
| Long prompts | One price | One price |
| Price change | Introductory price through 30 November 2026; $4 input and $20 output per 1M tokens from 1 December 2026.[5] | None announced |
| Open weights | No[6] Served through the Gemini API; no weights are published. | No[7] Listed as an API model, not in OpenAI's open-weight section. |
| Reads | text, image, video, audio, pdf[3] | text, image[4] |
Benchmarks
None of the benchmarks below has a published score for both models. We only show a score we can cite with its source and date; "Not published" means we found none for that model, not that it scored zero.
| Benchmark | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Agentic coding tasks in a real terminal. | 57.4%[8] Google's comparison table as reproduced by HackerNoon. | Not published |
| FrontierCode 1.1 (Main)Hard software engineering tasks. | Not published | Not published |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)Expert-level questions across many fields, tools allowed. | Not published | Not published |
What a coding session costs
Our own estimate from the list prices above, for three sessions we define: a coding agent resends the conversation with every call, so prompts are large and grow. "Cached" assumes 90% of prompt tokens are read from the prompt cache and leaves out cache write fees. A long-prompt price applies when a call's prompt is over its threshold. Work out your own mix with the token cost calculator.
| Session | Gemini 4 Argon | Gemini 4 Argon cached | GPT-6.1 Sol | GPT-6.1 Sol cached |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quick fix10 calls of 25K prompt and 1.5K output tokens | $0.65 | $0.22 | $0.65 | $0.22 |
| Feature session60 calls of 80K prompt and 2K output tokens | $10.80 | $2.59 | $10.80 | $2.59 |
| Long agent day300 calls of 150K prompt and 2.5K output tokens | $97.50 | $20.55 | $97.50 | $20.55 |
Value for money and release gap
Gemini 4 Argon is dated 1 day later (GPT-6.1 Sol: first API listing). Price per point divides our feature-session cost by a published score: lower means more score for the money. It is a rough lens, not a ranking.
| Measure | Gemini 4 Argon | GPT-6.1 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Input tokens per $1 | 500K | 500K |
| Filling the whole context window once | $2.10 | $2.10 |
Questions
Do Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-6.1 Sol cost the same?
Until 30 November 2026, yes: $2 per 1M input tokens, $10 per 1M output and $0.10 cached. From 1 December 2026 Gemini 4 Argon costs $4 and $20.
Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or GPT-6.1 Sol?
We have one benchmark score between them: the 57.4% Gemini 4 Argon scored on Terminal-Bench 4.0. We found no score for GPT-6.1 Sol that we could cite.
Which writes longer replies?
GPT-6.1 Sol, up to 128K output tokens, against 66K for Gemini 4 Argon. Their context windows are the same size, 1.05M tokens.
Most compared
Any other two models: pick them in the lists at the top of the page.
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Sol
- GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Opus 5 vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Haiku 5.5
- Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Fable 5.1
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
- Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
- Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs Grok 4.7
- Claude Opus 5.5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Kimi K3
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GLM-5.3
More tools
Sources
- blog.google: innovation-and-ai/models-and-research/gemini-models/gemini-4-argon, read
- openrouter.ai: openai/gpt-6.1-sol, read
- ai.google.dev: gemini-api/docs/models/gemini-4-argon, read
- developers.openai.com: api/docs/models/gpt-6.1-sol, read
- ai.google.dev: gemini-api/docs/pricing, read
- ai.google.dev: gemini-api/docs/models, read
- developers.openai.com: api/docs/models/all, read
- hackernoon.com: gemini-4-argon-how-does-it-do-against-gpt-6-astra-and-claude, read
Numbers from the makers' own pages, checked by hand, last read . List prices in US dollars before tax. Spotted a mistake? office@shuriken.sh.
Made by Shuriken, the harness for coding agents. Its hot swapping moves your chats to another of your accounts or API keys when one nears its limit. Use only accounts you own and are entitled to use.
Try Shuriken on your own computerYou're signed in
Add your Claude, Codex and Gemini accounts once. Shuriken switches between them so your agents keep working.Your accounts, projects and chats are in the app.
